Amicus Brief: Berger v. North Carolina Conference of the NAACP

Download PDF

Introduction

The American Legislative Exchange Council informed the U.S. Supreme Court in an amicus brief filed in Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP that state legislatures should have the ability to defend the constitutionality of state laws in court.

State legislatures have a strong interest ensuring that the laws it debates and enacts are found to be constitutional. These legislatures should be able to determine who should represent the state when laws are challenged. And while federal courts can establish procedural rules, courts’ analysis should not use the rules to trump state law. Instead, state law should be used to help interpret and inform federal procedural rules. 

More in "Amicus Briefs"

  • Amicus Brief: Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota

    The Republican National Committee (RNC) is challenging a Ninth Circuit decision involving Arizona’s documentary proof of citizenship requirements for voter registration. The Ninth Circuit held that the National Voter Registration…

  • Amicus Brief: Ream v. U.S. Department of the Treasury

    John Ream, an Ohio resident who wants to distill spirits at home for personal use, challenged the federal prohibition on home distilling, arguing that Congress lacks constitutional authority to prohibit…

  • Amicus Brief: Alaska Policy Forum v. Alaska Public Offices Commission

    Alaska Policy Forum (APF), a nonprofit public-policy organization, published materials (blogs/articles) criticizing ranked-choice voting before Alaska’s 2020 election, when voters were considering a ballot initiative that included ranked-choice voting. Alaska…

+ All Publications in Amicus Briefs