Draft
21st Century Commercial Nexus Act
Model Policy
{Title, enacting clause, etc.}
Section 1. {Title} This Act may be cited as The 21st Century Commercial Nexus Act.
Section 2. {Statement of Purpose} It is the intent of the LEGISLATIVE BODY to create a bright line rule, similar to that espoused by the Supreme Court of the United States in Quill v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), to determine when a business must collect and remit sales and use tax to the state of {insert name}.
Section 3. {Definitions}
(A) “business” means any entity engaged in commerce or enterprise.
(B) “employees” means paid servants of a business that lives or works in the state of {insert name}.
(C) “common carrier” means mail, air, ground, rail or other form of transportation commonly used to facilitate business.
(D) “advertising” means the promotion of products or services of a particular business in print, electronic, television, radio or other forms of media.
(E) “licensing” means an agreement between a software seller and software user that the user will be the sole consumer of the software product.
(F) “representatives” means employees or independent contractors of a business.
(G) “nexus” means substantial physical presence, such as facilities, plants, distribution centers, offices, property and employees.
Section 4. {Amendment to State Sales and Use Tax Code}
Section {insert appropriate section}is amended to read:
(A) No business shall be liable to collect and remit sales and use tax to the state of {insert name} unless the business has nexus in the state of {insert name}.
(B) Conducting economic activities, such as, but not limited to, directing business activities toward the state of {insert name}by use of telecommunications or common carrier, advertising in the state of {insert name}, licensing software in the state of {insert name}, deriving income or revenue from customers in the state of {insert name}, sending representatives to the state of {insert name}to generate business, attending trade shows in the state of {insert name}, conducting seminars in the state of {insert name}, assessing competitor’s products in the state of {insert name}, without more, is not enough to constitute nexus in the state of {insert name}.
Section 5. {Severability Clause.}
Section 6. {Repealer Clause.}
Section 7. {Effective Date.}